Matters

Obtained Favorable Settlement in Trademark Infringement Case

Share This Page:

Represented international industrial manufacturer in trademark infringement and false designation of origin litigation under the Lanham Act in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Obtained permanent injunction and favorable settlement for the client.

Highlights

Slide 1 of 10

Publications
Federal Oversight of State Ethics Investigations
Kelly Robier wrote in the Bar Association of Montgomery County’s May newsletter about the U.S. Department of Justice’s proposal of a new process for evaluating state bar complaints against its…
Events
Chicks with Sticks/KeyBank Fundraiser
Blog Posts
Proposed DFARS Rule Would Expand Foreign Ownership Disclosure
Matters
Third-Party Investigator for University
Miles & Stockbridge serves as a third-party investigator at a private university, assisting with investigating multiple student, faculty and staff complaints. The firm has performed investigations on a diverse array of…
Events
Navigating CMMC and Cyber Risk in Government Contracts CLE Webinar Series Part 3
Preparing for Your Assessment and Ensuring Continued Compliance with Guest Presenter Ben Tchoubineh, CEO of LEXX Prepare for a CMMC assessment and discover strategies to sustain compliance. Participants will navigate assessment…
News
AANHPI Heritage Month Spotlight: Christine Pham
Matters
False Claims Act Defense of Financial Services Company in Federal Investigation
Defended a financial services company during a federal investigation by the DOJ under the False Claims Act as well as inquiries by other government agencies and Congress. This “bet-the-company litigation”…
News
Miles & Stockbridge Welcomes Nine Summer Associates
Publications
The 5 Percent Squeeze: Section 875 of the FY26 NDAA and the New Protest Risk Calculus
The FY26 National Defense Authorization Act allows the Department of Defense to withhold up to 5% of payments from contractors who protest a follow-on award before the Government Accountability Office,…
Blog Posts
What’s Different in the Proposed Joint Employer Rule

This website does not track your personal or demographic information, only anonymous usage statistics. To ensure that you are not tracked, we have blocked all embedded content from third party sources like YouTube and SlideShare. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable third-party content. To learn more about our cookie policy, click here.

Accept CookiesNo Thanks

Matters

Obtained Favorable Settlement in Trademark Infringement Case

Related People

Related Services

Federal Oversight of State Ethics Investigations

Chicks with Sticks/KeyBank Fundraiser

Proposed DFARS Rule Would Expand Foreign Ownership Disclosure

Third-Party Investigator for University

Navigating CMMC and Cyber Risk in Government Contracts CLE Webinar Series Part 3

AANHPI Heritage Month Spotlight: Christine Pham

False Claims Act Defense of Financial Services Company in Federal Investigation

Miles & Stockbridge Welcomes Nine Summer Associates

The 5 Percent Squeeze: Section 875 of the FY26 NDAA and the New Protest Risk Calculus

What’s Different in the Proposed Joint Employer Rule