Daniel Adamson is smiling wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and yellow tie with blue dots.

Daniel L. Adamson

Associate
publications

Maryland’s Highest Court Issues Landmark Decision Adopting Daubert Admissibility Standard

Article
American Bar Association Mass Torts Litigation Newsletter
Share This Page:

Over 80 percent of states now apply some version of the Daubert test for determining whether to admit expert testimony. Maryland’s adoption has pushed Frye to the brink. Maryland’s highest court ended its most recent term with a stunning finale. In Rochkind v. Stevenson (Stevenson II), 2020 WL 5085877 (Md. Aug. 28, 2020), Judge Getty, writing for a 4–3 majority, ditched Maryland’s Frye-Reed standard governing the admissibility of expert testimony in favor of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and its progeny.

Click here to read the full article written by Joshua Kahn and Daniel Adamson published in the American Bar Association's Mass Torts Litigation Newsletter. Login may be required.

Click here to read a MSLaw blog post published about the same topic.

Highlights
Slide 1 of 10
This website does not track your personal or demographic information, only anonymous usage statistics. To ensure that you are not tracked, we have blocked all embedded content from third party sources like YouTube and SlideShare. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable third-party content. To learn more about our cookie policy, click here.
Accept CookiesNo Thanks