Beware Hidden Dangers of Remote Work Post-COVID
The COVID-19 pandemic changed the way many employers view remote work. Those who had a positive experience may be considering making telecommuting a permanent part of their workplace, but must be aware of the dangers lurking for employers who fail to take into consideration employment and tax compliance associated with remote work. Many states have overlooked temporary remote arrangements necessitated by the pandemic, but will not excuse compliance if remote work continues going forward.
Many aspects of the employment relationship are governed by state (and sometimes county or city) laws and regulations. Wage and hour, paid and unpaid leave requirements, meal and rest break requirements, paycheck timing, and anti-discrimination rules all can be governed by state or local law. In a traditional employment setting, the employee works at a single site, usually an office or other workplace where the employer has a base of operations. In such a case, the employer and employee are subject to employment laws of the local area where the worksite is located, regardless of where the employee lives. When an employee works remotely, in most cases, the employment laws where the employee is physically located will govern, rather than the laws of the employer’s worksite (if one even exists). Thus, an employer with a base of operations in one state, but with five employees working from home in five different states, will need to be aware of not only the employment laws where the office is located, but the employment laws of those five states. Employers may find themselves with the obligation to provide remote employees with different benefits, such as paid sick leave, that they do not offer to in-person workers. Employers with employees in states such as California and New York may find that their levels of pay are not sufficient to meet the state law requirements for employees to be exempt from overtime. In addition to the compliance issues, employers will need to consider the employee relations impacts of such differences. As state and local employment laws continue to proliferate, compliance will only become more difficult as time goes by.
The dangers do not end with employment law compliance. Having remote employees can have significant tax consequences for employers. Employers may have obligations to withhold for income tax purposes and pay unemployment taxes in remote employees’ home states. The tax consequences of remote employees may be even more significant, however, if “nexus” is created in a state. The presence of even one remote employee in a state, particularly in combination with other factors, may be sufficient to create a “nexus” with that state, making the employer potentially subject to requirements to register to do business, as well as income tax, gross receipts tax, and/or sales tax obligations. In addition to state-level tax consequences, the presence of a remote employee can also trigger income tax, gross receipts tax, or sales tax obligations at the local level.
As noted, many states have either formally or informally overlooked remote work that was a direct result of COVID-19. As a result, employers have been relatively free to permit employees to work from home or other locations without incurring legal risk. However, as states of emergency are being lifted and employees are no longer required to work remotely for health and safety reasons, states are expected to step up compliance efforts. Employers should take action to understand where employees are working now in order to evaluate the risk, and should carefully consider whether to permit employees to continue to work remotely, particularly on a full-time basis and particularly in certain states, with an eye toward the legal compliance associated with that choice.
Any opinions expressed and any legal positions asserted in the article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of Miles & Stockbridge P.C. or its other lawyers. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice on any particular matter. It is not intended to and does not create any attorney-client relationship. Because legal advice must vary with individual circumstances, do not act or refrain from acting on the basis of this article without consulting professional legal counsel. If you would like additional in-formation on the subject matter of this article, please feel free to contact any of the lawyers listed above. If you communicate with us, whether through email or other means, your communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship with either Miles & Stockbridge P.C. or any of the firm's lawyers. At Miles & Stockbridge P.C., an attorney-client relationship can be formed only by personal contact with an individual lawyer, not by email, and requires our agreement to act as your legal counsel together with your execution of a written engagement agreement with Miles & Stockbridge P.C.
