Principal
Representative Matters
- United States of Am. ex. rel. Mich. v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., et al., Case No. 24-1379 (6th Cir., Jan. 15, 2025) -successfully defended dismissal of relators’ allegations that defendants had engaged in a scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid in violation of the False Claims Act
- GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Green, 308 A.3d 132 (Del. 2022)- successfully defended judgment in favor of defendant on breach of contract and bad faith breach of contract claims, and obtained reversal of issuance of declaratory judgment concerning adjustment of no-fault claims
- Ervin v. Kennedy Krieger Inst. Inc., 2018 WL 3090454 (Md. App. 2018) – successfully defended judgments in favor of defendant on claims arising from participant’s alleged exposure to lead poisoning while involved in clinical trial study concerning expert evidentiary issues
- Smith v. Kennedy Kreiger Inst. Inc., 2017 WL 1076481 (Md. App. 2017)- successfully defended judgments in favor of defendant on claims arising from participant’s alleged exposure to lead poisoning while involved in clinical trial study concerning expert evidentiary issues, jury instructions, and claims of negligence, fraud and battery
- Johnson v. GEICO Cas. Co., 672 Fed. Appx.150 (3d Cir. 2016) – successfully defended grant of summary judgment in favor of insurer and decertification of classes concerning insurer’s adjustment of no-fault claims
- Armstrong v. Kennedy Krieger Instit. Inc., Case No. 24-C-11-005913 (Mem. Op. Denying Certification of Class, J. Videtta Brown, Jan. 11, 2016) – successfully defeated class certification
- Ervin v. Kennedy Krieger Instit. Inc., Case No. 24-C-12-002081 (Mem. Op. Denying Certification of Class, J. Videtta Brown, March 9, 2015) ) – successfully defeated class certification
- White v. Kennedy Krieger Instit., Inc., 221 Md. App. 601, 110 A.3d 724 (2015), cert. denied, 443 Md. 237, 116 A.3d 476 (2015)-successfully defended judgments in favor of defendant on claims for fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation and violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act
- CSR, Ltd v. Taylor, 411 Md. 457, 983 A.2d 492 (2009) – obtained reversal of appellate court’s decision by establishing a lack of sufficient minimum contacts necessary to establish personal jurisdiction in Maryland over a foreign entity in violation of due process
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Benjamin, 394 Md. 59, 904 A.2d 511 (2006) – obtained important ruling on the "discovery rule" relating to statute of limitations
- Creveling v. Gov’t Emps. Ins. Co., 376 Md. 72, 828 A.2d 229 (2003) – successfully defended denial of class certification
