Blog Posts: MSLaw Blog 

SDAT Filing Process During COVID-19 Outbreak
by Zachary S. Schultz on March 19, 2020
With the numerous changes to working procedures as a result of COVID-19, the impact on the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) is no different. For filings that are unable to be completed online, SDAT is currently working on a plan for arranging appointments and/or scheduling times for the drop-off of documents and filings. SDAT continues to assess its resources and capabilities. Currently, SDAT is closed to the public and that is unlikely to change soon. If SDAT is
Go
2018 Legislative Update
by Zachary S. Schultz, Scott R. Wilson on September 25, 2018
During its 438th session, the Maryland General Assembly passed four bills that affect the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), all of which were supported by the Business Law Section of the Maryland State Bar Association. This update is intended to identify (i) bills that were passed affecting the MGCL in the last legislative session, and (ii) laws that will take effect on October 1, 2018. In the 2018 legislative session, the Maryland General Assembly: repealed the provision requiring articles of transfer; limited
Go
Mootness Fees in Maryland Stockholder Litigation
by Zachary S. Schultz, Scott R. Wilson on July 18, 2018
The Delaware Court of Chancery fundamentally altered the M&A litigation landscape when it expressed its skepticism of disclosure-only settlements in the case of In re Trulia, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, 129 A.3d 884 (Del. Ch. 2016). There has subsequently been much written about Trulia and the relative scarcity of disclosure-only settlements in its wake. Of significantly lesser renown, the Court of Chancery further observed in Trulia that adversarial motions for attorneys’ fees, following a corporation’s “mooting” of plaintiff-stockholder disclosure claims through supplementary disclosures, are free of
Go
CFPB Class Action Waiver Rule Invalidated Amidst Ongoing Diminution of CFPB Power
by Zachary S. Schultz on January 30, 2018
In October 2017, the United States Senate voted to invalidate a rule promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which would have prohibited financial institutions from using arbitration agreements in which the consumer waives the right to participate in a class action. The rule—which was announced by the CFPB in July 2017 and was not yet in effect at the time it was invalidated—prohibited class action waivers imbedded in consumer arbitration agreements (the “Arbitration Rule”). If the Arbitration Rule
Go
The Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of “Debt Collector” Under FDCPA
by Zachary S. Schultz on June 26, 2017
On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States (the “Court”) issued a decision clarifying who qualifies as a “debt collector” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. In the case of Henson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., No. 16-349 October Term, 2016, 582 U.S. __ (2017), the Court examined “how to classify individuals and entities who regularly purchase debts originated by someone else and then seek to collect those debts for their own account.” Slip
Go