Medical Malpractice, Healthcare & Medical Products

publications

The ACA Has Made The Collateral Source Rule Obsolete

Law360
Share This Page:

In almost half of U.S. jurisdictions, the common law collateral source rule bars defendants from reducing damages they might owe a plaintiff by showing that a “collateral source” paid a given amount. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 902A (1979); see generally Bryce Benjet, A Review of State Law Modifying the Collateral Source Rule: Seeking Greater Fairness in Economic Damages Awards, 76 Def. Couns. J. 210 (2009) (noting that Arizona, California, D.C., Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin retain the common law collateral source rule for some or all causes of action).

Click here to read the entire article.

Republished with permission.

Highlights
Slide 1 of 10
This website does not track your personal or demographic information, only anonymous usage statistics. To ensure that you are not tracked, we have blocked all embedded content from third party sources like YouTube and SlideShare. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable third-party content. To learn more about our cookie policy, click here.
Accept CookiesNo Thanks